"Performance is defined as the execution of an action; something accomplished; the fulfillment of a promise, claim, or request" (Huber, 2009, p. 715).
I do not personally have much experience with performance reviews or appraisals but the few experiences I have had were mainly revolved around peer reviews. Peer reviews have positive and negative sides to them. I say there are negatives sides to these types of reviews because in my experience I have worked within a small group where we all worked very well together and we were all were on a friendship based level where constructive feedback was not of the highest priority when completing the peer review evaluation. Also, when the time of year came around for completing performance appraisals managers ask employees who, within other departments have we worked closely with, would be a good co-worker for completing a review. This enables employees to choose peer reviewers who they know will give them good reviews that are not allows focused making specific adjustments in their role to meet or exceed performance expectations.
Leaders can develop methods for evaluating and improving performance continually, through out the year instead of using a once a year stressful meeting to evaluate performance by using the following methods:
competencies, the more likely it is that the mentorship will be productive" (Huber, 2009, p.724).
- The Vanderbilt Professional Nursing Practice Program
Click HERE to view the Vanderbilt Professional Nursing Practice Program, Part 2 Integrating a Professional Advancement and Performance Evaluation System. There are three parts to the program and Part 2 will examine the performance measurement and evaluation system created to support the program.
Reference
Huber, D. H. (2009). Leadership and nursing care management. 4th edition. Saunders, Elsevier Health Sciences. Maryland Heights, MO.